Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -MomentumProfit Zone
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-18 19:17:28
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (792)
Related
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Health firm wrongly told hundreds of people they might have cancer
- See the Best Dressed Stars Ever at the Kentucky Derby
- Nearly 8 million kids lost a parent or primary caregiver to the pandemic
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- 300 Scientists Oppose Trump Nominee: ‘More Dangerous Than Climate Change is Lying’
- Why Lisa Vanderpump Is Closing Her Famed L.A. Restaurant Pump for Good
- The top White House monkeypox doc takes stock of the outbreak — and what's next
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- You Won't Be Sleepless Over This Rare Photo of Meg Ryan
Ranking
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- The Summer I Turned Pretty Season 2 Finally Has a Release Date
- Today’s Climate: May 24, 2010
- Mothers tell how Pakistan's monsoon floods have upended their lives
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- FDA expected to authorize new omicron-specific COVID boosters this week
- Robert Kennedy Jr.'s Instagram account has been restored
- 300 Scientists Oppose Trump Nominee: ‘More Dangerous Than Climate Change is Lying’
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Life expectancy in the U.S. continues to drop, driven by COVID-19
TikToker and Dad of 3 Bobby Moudy Dead by Suicide at Age 46
58 Cheap Things to Make Your Home Look Expensive
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
Who are the Rumpels? Couple says family members were on private plane that crashed.
Resolution Opposing All New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure Passes in Portland
Poll: One year after SB 8, Texans express strong support for abortion rights